The paper argues that GRPO can concentrate policy updates on responses that the base model already produces with high probability, reducing the coverage of reasoning paths and hurting Pass@k when k is large. ReCo addresses this at two levels: it normalizes response contributions by their expected occurrence in a rollout group, and replaces the token-level importance ratio with a variance-based ratio that emphasizes non-saturated decision points where alternatives remain plausible. On five mathematical reasoning benchmarks using Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B/7B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, ReCo reportedly improves large-k Pass@k while remaining comparable to GRPO at small k.
No heat snapshots are available in the last 24 hours.