This paper studies over-inference (OI), where personalized LLMs fabricate user attributes beyond the available evidence. The authors introduce MirageBench with 150 personas, six personalization tasks, a four-way faithfulness taxonomy, and 143,616 judged claims across 12 models from seven families. Every evaluated model over-inferred 35%–49% of claims, with a cross-model mean of 41.6%. Model self-assessments were negatively rank-correlated with judge-measured OI, suggesting that self-reported confidence is unreliable for comparing personalization systems.
No heat snapshots are available in the last 24 hours.