This paper studies how AI agents can cooperate when the costs of cooperation arrive before the benefits, creating incentives to defect. Inspired by legal contracting, the authors evaluate self-negotiated contracts between LLM-based agents in CT, a spatial-temporal game combining bargaining with navigation toward a goal. The study compares contract representations ranging from formal agreements that compile into code to natural-language contracts requiring reinterpretation. Across multiple LLM backbones, model sizes, and providers, the authors report that self-negotiated contracts can produce better cooperative outcomes than regular trading alone.
No heat snapshots are available in the last 24 hours.