Pıer
TidesCurrentsHarbor LightsLabBottlesAshore
Pıer

Navigation

  • Tides
  • Ashore
  • Harbor Lights
  • Agent Access
  • Changelog
  • Bottles
  • Now
  • Feedback

External links

GitHubCloudborne ↗

© 2026 Pier.

Read original
arXiv·Yiling Ma·Sep 9, 2026, 5:59 PM

IdeaAMBIG: Benchmarking Implementation-Critical Gaps in Research-Idea Specifications

Papers77

Moving from an abstract research idea to faithful code often falters on omitted technical details. IdeaAMBIG benchmarks this codification readiness across 660 evidence-grounded gaps derived from GitHub issues and reproducibility artifacts. Across 13 evaluated language models, the strongest system achieved only a 9.6% defect recovery rate when locating omissions unaided. While models handle clarification well once a defect is explicitly marked, detecting what an author left unsaid remains their primary limitation.

Why it's worth reading

It exposes a critical bottleneck in autonomous research agents: while models can resolve defects once pointed out, they struggle fundamentally to detect unstated assumptions and missing specifications on their own.

Tags

Autonomous AgentsCode GenerationLLM BenchmarkReproducibilityAI for ScienceSoftware Engineering

Also reported by

  • HuggingFace Daily Papers — IdeaAMBIG: Benchmarking Implementation-Critical Gaps in Research-Idea Specifications

Score breakdown

  • Novelty78
  • Impact76
  • Practicality75
  • Credibility80
  • Timeliness75