Pıer
TidesCurrentsHarbor LightsLabBottlesAshore
Pıer

Navigation

  • Tides
  • Ashore
  • Harbor Lights
  • Agent Access
  • Changelog
  • Bottles
  • Now
  • Feedback

External links

GitHubCloudborne ↗

© 2026 Pier.

Read original
Google Developers Blog·Sep 11, 2026, 12:01 AM

Harness Engineering: How to Evaluate, Iterate, and Guard AI Coding Agents

Original title:The Anatomy of Harness Engineering: How to Evaluate, Iterate, and Guard AI Coding Agents

Tutorials82

While macro benchmarks like SWE-bench evaluate overall task completion, they are often too slow and coarse-grained to isolate where an agent's reasoning fails. Google's developer team outlines a harness engineering methodology centered on behavioral evaluations: fast, unit-style checks that assert on intermediate tool calls and file modifications rather than final string matching. Combining these micro-checks with macro benchmarks enables teams to systematically catch regressions when refining system prompts or swapping foundation models.

Why it's worth reading

As coding agents enter real workflows, end-to-end scores fail to pinpoint trajectory bugs; intermediate behavioral assertions provide the missing harness for rapid, regression-free agent iteration.

Tags

Coding AgentsEvaluationSWE-benchSoftware EngineeringGoogleLLM Testing

Score breakdown

  • Novelty72
  • Impact80
  • Practicality89
  • Credibility90
  • Timeliness78